Exclusives, Patient Care, Trauma

Quaternary Blast Injuries in Lithium-Ion Battery Explosions

Over the last three decades, lithium-ion battery technology has increasingly provided the primary means of extended use of both industrial and consumer-grade portable electronic devices. While these devices are largely safe, they are known to carry a risk of explosions with resulting injuries ranging in severity from small superficial burns to death.18 A February 2018 report by the U.S. Consumer Safety Commission reported over 25 thousand overheating or fire incidents involving a wide range of products over a 5-year period.11

In January 2020, the Federal Aviation Authority reported 280 incidents involving lithium-ion batteries on aircraft or in airports since January 20066, and in October 2016, the FAA banned passengers from carrying Galaxy Note 7 devices onboard commercial aircraft after a series of the phones caught fire.5 The manufacturer, Samsung, acknowledged design and manufacturing errors in the batteries being the cause of the fires and took steps to stop customers from using units which were already in the hands of users.16

Related

After a rash of explosions and fires caused by faulty batteries in so-called “Hoverboards” marketed from several manufacturers under a variety of brands, including a fire in Pennsylvania which took the lives of two young children, the Consumer Product Safety Commission issued a recall of half a million units from retail locations across the country.15

In a similar string of battery incidents, a teenager was killed last year after his vape exploded in his face and a piece of shrapnel punctured an artery.9 Even the Boeing 787 Dreamliner was grounded for a time after a lithium battery fire issue.7 The common thread in all of these incidents is the dramatic failures of lithium-ion or lithium-ion polymer batteries.

Essentially, all batteries use some form of ion suspended in an electrolyte solution between solids to store electrical energy in a chemical gradient.1 The lead-acid battery in your car uses lead ions stored as lead and lead dioxide plates suspended in sulfuric acid.17 Lithium-ion, or “Li-ion,” batteries use carbon and a metal oxide with a lithium-ion electrolyte solution to perform the same general task as the battery in your car, but at up to four or five times higher energy density.1 Lithium-ion Polymer, or “LiPo,” batteries are essentially the same for the purposes of this discussion.1 One of the most popular forms of lithium-ion battery is the 18650 cell: a 3.7volt cylindrical battery slightly larger than the common “AA” battery. A single 18650 cell can hold up to 3,500 mAh.1

These 18650 Lithium-Ion battery cells, with a standard alkaline AA cell for size comparison, are common and safe when handled properly. Mishandling can result in severe consequences. (Photo by the author.)
These 18650 Lithium-Ion battery cells, with a standard alkaline AA cell for size comparison, are common and safe when handled properly. Mishandling can result in severe consequences. (Photo by the author.)

Different variants of the 18650 cell are available which can optimize either capacity or maximum continuous discharge rate at the cost of decreasing the other. These cells are extremely popular because they are compact, energy dense and easy to arrange in patterns which essentially create a single large battery of varying voltage and capacity.

If you are reading this using a common laptop, the battery inside your laptop is likely up to six of these 18650 cells arranged in parallel, providing a continuous DC voltage of 3.7-4.2 volts over an extended period of time. Something like a hoverboard, electric kick scooter, or electric bicycle would likely have a combination of cells in series to increase voltage and in parallel to increase capacity. These small cells are even used in Tesla electric cars and are arranged into massive power banks providing high-enough voltage and current to propel a vehicle with occupants to freeway speeds.2

The Danger

Recently, manufacturer LG Electronics began a public awareness ad campaign and launched a website dedicated to educating consumers on the dangers of handling bare 18650 cells. In short, repeatedly removing and replacing 18650 cells from containers can damage the polymer jackets and create opportunity for accidental short circuits.

A sustained short circuit can cause the cell to heat up and eventually enter a phenomenon known as “thermal runaway,” in which the exothermic reactions become self-sustaining.10 This event is what commonly is experienced as a battery “exploding,” and often involves extreme heat, flame and the production of flammable and otherwise toxic gases. Thermal runaway can also be induced by external heat, such as flame, and thermal runaway in one cell can quickly create enough heat to overheat adjacent cells leading to what an engineer might call “the rapid, unscheduled disassembly” of an entire battery bank.10 Though uncommon due to protective circuitry installed in most devices with Li-Ion batteries, discharging at too high of a rate, charging at too high of a rate, or overcharging Li-Ion batteries can also cause heating and thermal runaway.10 Thermal burns can be a distracting injury in incidents where Li-Ion batteries “explode” in close proximity to a patient, such as in their pocket or sitting on their lap, since this is likely to be the patient’s primary complaint.

This burn pattern was caused by the thermal runaway of two 18650 cells in the patient’s pocket. The patient reached cross-body and was able to remove the fiery device from his left pocket, burning his right hand in the process. Shared with permission from the patient. (Photo by William Copeland.)

These thermal burns have been found in reviews of vape and cell phone incidents to be often a mixture of partial and full thickness burns, commonly requiring intensive and definitive treatment in the hospital.8,12 Primary blast injuries to soft tissues and membranes from over-pressure are possible if the thermal runaway event occurs in a vape device which is being held in close proximity to the patient’s face, but the “explosion” of a Li-Ion cell is more likely to behave like the release of high-pressure steam rather than a true detonation.3 If the cells are being contained in a sealed container which holds the gases until a much higher pressure is achieved, this could change, but such arrangements are not common in consumer devices.

Secondary blast injuries from flying shrapnel are certainly possible and, as has already been mentioned, are credited with primary causality in the death of a teen who died after a vape device exploded near his face.3,4,9 Tertiary blast injuries are rather unlikely as the detonation velocity of a Li-Ion cell, or even a pack constructed of several cells in a consumer device, is relatively low. It would take an extremely large pack to generate an overpressure capable of pushing over a person, much less actually propelling them any distance into an object or onto the ground.

The hidden threat in Li-Ion incidents lies within the gases emitted from a failing cell. The electrolyte solution within an Li-Ion cell is flammable and failing cells can release flammable gases. A Li-Ion cell undergoing thermal runaway can also release gaseous hydrogen fluoride, or HF.10 This HF gas is not flammable, but highly corrosive and systemically toxic. Even if a cell has had a relatively slow burst and a patient has not received blast injuries or any significant thermal burns, they may develop chemical burns immediately or up to 24 hours later on areas of the body which have come into contact with the gases released.10

This can also occur inside the patient’s airway if these gases were inhaled, possibly leading to the necessity of intubation and aggressive airway management even 24 hours after the incident.10 Transmucosal or transdermal absorption of unsafe levels of fluoride ions can also cause severe electrolyte imbalances including hypocalcemia, hypomagnesemia and hyperkalemia.10 All of these can manifest in several S/Sx patterns, including their characteristic ECG disturbances, which may warn of impending cardiovascular collapse.10

Call Narrative

  • You and your EMT partner are onboard Medic 1 when you are dispatched emergency traffic to a call of an adult male, conscious and breathing, with unknown injuries from an explosion at a coffee shop. As you are en route, dispatch updates you with their secondary, you are told the following: “Caller states that his electronic cigarette device exploded in his pocket and burned his leg.”
  • At this point you should consider that the device likely is powered by a rechargeable Li-Ion battery. Think for a moment about whether you carry calcium gluconate in your main bag, you may want it on scene.
  • You arrive on scene to find a 24 year-old male seated in a chair in the coffee shop. There’s a light chemical odor in the air mixed with the smell of burnt cloth and flesh. The charred device is on the ground away from everyone in the shop. You speak with him and he addresses you appropriately, you quickly determine that he is your only patient, A&Ox4, GCS 15, and C-spine precautions are not indicated. He reports no other S/Sx except 9/10 pain from the burn on his leg, and when asked he does not recall whether he inhaled any of the gases or smoke. Your EMS partner cuts away the surrounding portion of his pants to visualize the burn while you talk with your patient and take a set of vitals. There’s a small area, roughly 1”x1” of likely full thickness burn, with a small surrounding field of partial thickness and superficial burns just above the knee on the lateral aspect of his thigh. Total burn area appears to be roughly the size of a 4×5 note card. Discussing the incident with your patient, he confirms that the device was powered by two 18650 cells and that he’s heard of them exploding before.
  • Consider, if your protocols allow, dressing the wound by mixing calcium gluconate with water-based lubricant at a ratio of 2.5 g calcium gluconate in 100 mL of water-soluble lubricant (1 ampule of 10% calcium gluconate per ounce of lubricant). Do not use calcium carbonate as this will harm your patient. Calcium gluconate only. Calcium gluconate may interact ionically to render the HF inert.12
  • Having dressed the patient’s primary burn with calcium gluconate slurry and gotten a set of vitals (BP-155/98, P-89, SpO2-97%), your patient still reports no other S/Sx aside from the aforementioned pain, which is still 9/10. You and your partner load your patient onto the stretcher and move to the ambulance. When you get into the ambulance, you note a growing area of erythema forming over almost the entire lateral aspect of your patient’s thigh and he reports increased pain over that area outside the primary burn. You assess he is probably suffering growing chemical burns from HF exposure, so you mix up additional calcium gluconate slurry and dress the area of erythema. You begin 3-lead ECG monitoring. After gaining peripheral IV access and administering fentanyl for pain management, you place your patient on end-tidal CO2 monitoring and tell your partner to begin non-emergent transport to the hospital as you call in your report. A couple minutes down the road, your patient starts becoming inappropriately lethargic. Over the course of one minute, his saturations drop from 97% to 87% and continue to tick downwards as his end-tidal CO2 also begins to rise. You take a position at your patient’s head and request that he open his mouth. As you position his airway for a better view, significant erythema and edema of the upper airway is visible. Your patient becomes unresponsive as you tell your partner to pull over and come to the back to assist with RSI/DSI per your agency protocol. After you’ve successfully medicated and intubated the patient and placed him on a transport ventilator according to protocol, your partner returns to the front to make emergent transport. His saturations stabilize at 93% and you update your receiving facility via radio.
  • With roughly three minutes until you arrive at the hospital, you begin to notice intermittent QT prolongation and lengthened ST segments in his ECG indicative of hypocalcemia and correct with an appropriate dose of calcium gluconate. His ECG normalizes over the following two minutes, and you arrive at the hospital. After a thorough patient handoff, the hospital assumes all aspects of patient care, and you and your partner return to the ambulance to decontaminate, restock and return to service.

Conclusion

This call would be a fairly extreme example of multiple possible medical complications arising in the same patient after a Li-Ion battery explosion, and while possible, is not typical. In this patient, he did not suffer significant primary, secondary or tertiary blast injuries, but rather suffered thermal and chemical burns to his thigh and inside his airway. He also experienced systemic effects from fluoride ion absorption which resulted in the cardiac symptoms presenting shortly before arrival at the hospital.

It is unlikely that one patient would present with this many of the possible complications this quickly from the amount of exposure experienced due to the explosion of a vape device containing two 18650 cells.

It is more possible to see this kind of presentation if someone was in proximity to the explosion of an electric scooter or other device with a battery bank containing possibly dozens of cells. If the event occurred in an airtight environment like an aircraft passenger compartment, this could also result in a higher exposure to HF gas. As Li-Ion batteries proliferate through our daily lives in consumer devices, the paramedic should be aware of the different possible complications which could arise when these devices malfunction, how to effectively monitor patients for possible quaternary blast injuries, and how to treat them appropriately within your agency’s protocols.

References

  1. Battery University [Internet]. Cadex Electronics. c2003-2020. BU-204: How do lithium batteries work; Updated 2018 Jun 01 [Cited 2020 Feb 29]; Available from: https://batteryuniversity.com/learn/article/lithium_based_batteries.
  2. Battery University [Internet]. Cadex Electronics. c2003-2020. BU-302: Series and parallel battery configurations; Updated 2019 Jun 18 [Cited 2020 Feb 29]; Available from: https://batteryuniversity.com/learn/article/serial_and_parallel_battery_configurations.
  3. Centers for Disease Control. Explosions and blast injuries, a primer for clinicians [Internet]. [Georgia]: Centers for Disease Control (US); [cited 2020 Mar 4]. [7 pages]. Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/masstrauma/preparedness/primer.pdf.
  4. Edwards, E. The battery behind dangerous and deadly e-cigarette explosions. NBC News [Internet]. 2019 Jul 24 [cited 2020 Feb 29];Health News:[about 5 screens]. Available from: https://www.nbcnews.com/health/health-news/battery-behind-dangerous-deadly-e-cigarette-explosions-n1032901.
  5. Federal Aviation Administration. DOT bans all Samsung Galaxy Note7 phones from airplanes [Internet]. [Washington]: Federal Aviation Administration (US); [revised 2016 Oct 20; cited 2020 Mar 10]. [1 screen]. Available from: https://www.faa.gov/news/updates/?newsId=86685.
  6. Federal Aviation Administration. Events with smoke, fire, extreme heat or explosion involving lithium batteries [Internet]. [Washington]: Federal Aviation Administration (US); [as of 2020 Jan 22; cited 2020 Jul 17]. Available from: https://www.faa.gov/hazmat/resources/lithium_batteries/media/Battery_incident_chart.pdf.
  7. Irfan, U. How lithium ion batteries grounded the Dreamliner. Scientific American [Internet]. 2014 Dec 18 [cited 2020 Mar 4]; Tech:[about 4 screens]. Available from: https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/how-lithium-ion-batteries-grounded-the-dreamliner/.
  8. Jones CD, Ho W, Gunn E, Widdowson D, Bahia H. E-cigarette burn injuries: Comprehensive review and management guidelines proposal. Burns. 2019 Jun;45(4):763-771. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2018.09.015. Epub 2018 Nov 12. PMID: 30442380.
  9. Kesslen, B. Texas man dies after e-cigarette explodes in his face. NBC News [Internet]. 2019 Feb 5 [cited 2020 Feb 29];Health News:[about 3 screens]. Available from: https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/man-dies-after-e-cigarette-explodes-his-face-n967241.
  10. Larsson, F., Andersson, P., Blomqvist, P. et al. Toxic fluoride gas emissions from lithium-ion battery fires. Sci Rep [Internet] 7, 10018 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-09784-z Available from: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-017-09784-z.
  11. Lee, D. Status report on high energy density batteries project. Rockville (MD): Consumer Product Safety Commission (US); 2018 Feb. 12.
  12. LG Chem. Stay Safe Battery. [Internet]. [place unknown]: Stay Safe Battery; [cited 2020 Mar 4]. Available from: http://www.staysafebattery.com/en/.
  13. Mankowski PJ, Kanevsky J, Bakirtzian P, Cugno S. Cellular phone collateral damage: A review of burns associated with lithium battery powered mobile devices. Burns. 2016 Jun;42(4):e61-4. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2015.10.012. Epub 2016 Feb 1. PMID: 26847612.
  14. Medical Management Guidelines for Hydrogen Fluoride [Internet]. Atlanta, GA: Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry, Centers for Disease Control (US); updated 2014 Oct 21; reviewed 2014 Oct 21; cited 2020 Feb 29] Available from: https://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/mmg/mmg.asp?id=1142&tid=250.
  15. Molina, B. Hoverboards recalled for fire and explosion risks — again. USA Today [Internet]. 2017 Nov 15 [Updated 2017 Nov 15; cited 2020 Feb 29]; Talking Tech:[about 12 p.]. Available from: https://www.usatoday.com/story/tech/talkingtech/2017/11/15/hoverboards-recalled-fire-and-explosion-risks-again/865643001/.
  16. Mozur, P. Galaxy Note 7 fires caused by battery and design flaws, Samsung says. New York Times [Internet]. 2017 Jan 22 [cited 2020 Mar 10]; Business:[about 6 screens]. Available from: https://www.nytimes.com/2017/01/22/business/samsung-galaxy-note-7-battery-fires-report.html.
  17. O’Connor J. Off-grid solar: A handbook for photovoltaics with lead-acid or lithium-ion batteries [Internet]. 2nd ed. Old Sequoia Publishing; c2019. Battery showdown: lead-acid vs. lithium-ion – Which is the best battery for an off grid energy system; [cited 2020 Feb 29]; [about 2 screens]. Available from: https://medium.com/solar-microgrid/battery-showdown-lead-acid-vs-lithium-ion-1d37a1998287.
  18. Palmieri TL, Yelon J, Shapiro D, Duncan T, Kuhls D. Lithium batteries: A technological advance with unintended injury consequences. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2018;85(2):406-409. doi:10.1097/TA.0000000000001946.