CPR Effectiveness

Does our belief that CPR is the best treatment for cardiac arrest actually hinder investigation of other possible treatments?

 

 
 
 

Bryan Bledsoe, DO, FACEP, FAAEM, EMT-P | | Monday, February 28, 2011


For almost two years I’ve been presenting a lecture on the dangers of excessive oxygen. The presentation, as you might imagine, was met with a good dose of healthy skepticism. Since then, there have been numerous studies detailing the detrimental effects of excessive oxygen. Even the American Heart Association (AHA) made mention of the lack of evidence supporting the use of supplemental oxygen for non-hypoxic patients. Be assured, I’m not boasting. I’m no smarter than the next guy. I just tend to follow the scientific literature, including some of the basic science literature, closely.

In the same light, I recently read an editorial in the New England Journal of Medicine that accompanied a paper by Myron L. Weisfeldt, MD, that showed that home AEDs were relatively ineffective in treating cardiac arrests. This editorial, written by Gust H. Bardy, MD, challenges one of the most fundamental principles of EMS—the effectiveness of CPR.

Bardy questions whether Weisfeldt’s negative home-AED findings were related to a lack of effectiveness of AEDs or more related to a lack of effectiveness of CPR. Bardy wrote, “As an alternative to a home AED, the increased use of CPR does not make sense to me. At best, CPR represents a placeholder. Overall survival rates remain poor, and 300,000 sudden cardiac deaths still occur annually in spite of national CPR awareness. One simple reason for such gloomy results may be the logistic impossibility of responding to a broadly disseminated, quasirandom event that causes death within minutes. Yet there may be another, more subtle reason for this bleak lack of progress. If CPR were a drug or a surgical procedure, its value would be tested prospectively, but it has not been. Could it be that innovation in the field is hampered by a reluctance to let go of an entrenched approach that has only the appearance of value?”

Stated another way, does our belief that CPR is the best treatment for cardiac arrest actually hinder investigation of other possible treatments?

Bardy supports his position in the following ways:
1. Improvements in cardiac arrest resuscitation in public venues (e.g., airports, casinos and shopping malls) have resulted from use of AEDs and not from CPR.
2. Despite 40 years of CPR, the overall national cardiac arrest resuscitation rate has remained dismal (about 8%).
3. The benefit of mass CPR training may only be related to the fact that the trained rescuer recognizes the problem (cardiac arrest) sooner, summons EMS and defibrillation is provided quicker.
4. Financial incentives keep CPR training a major emphasis. Providing and licensing CPR courses provides many organizations and companies (both profit and nonprofit organizations), such as the AHA, a significant source of income.
5. CPR isn’t harmless. Liver lacerations, crushing of coronary arteries, mediastinal hemorrhage, rupture of hollow organs (esophagus and intestines) and other complications have all been reported with CPR.
6. CPR performed after successful defibrillation may re-induce ventricular fibrillation (v-fib) in up to 22% of sudden cardiac arrest victims. Stated another way, we resuscitate patients with defibrillation and place them back in v-fib with CPR.

I think there’s a seventh reason that Bardy overlooked. The recent improvement in neurological outcomes in cardiac arrest hasn’t been due to CPR—but due to induced therapeutic hypothermia. Despite this, many EMS agencies are touting their improved cardiac arrest resuscitation rates as being related to CPR when, most likely, they’re related to more rapid defibrillation followed by therapeutic hypothermia if the patient experiences a return of spontaneous circulation.

Bardy ends his editorial by writing, “It is time to reassess the value of CPR, not dismiss definitive therapy with defibrillation. On purely structural grounds, it is difficult to see how a prospective, randomized clinical trial comparing CPR with no CPR could result in a win for CPR if the time to the 9-1-1 call is equilibrated by means of randomization. The worse that can happen with a neutral trial result is that we stop spending hundreds of millions of dollars and millions of hours of ‘training’ on a ‘therapy’ that makes people feel good but does little else. The cold, hard facts of the persistently low survival rate with the already existing national embrace of CPR make it hard to do worse.”

Whether Bardy is correct remains to be seen. But what he says makes sense, and I respect his courage to question the status quo. Mark Twain summed this up well when he wrote, “The man with a new idea is a crank until his idea succeeds.” Mark Twain is my hero, and Bardy is anything but a crank.
 



Related Links:



Connect: Have a thought or feedback about this? Add your comment now
Related Topics: Patient Care, Cardiac and Circulation, Ventricular Tachyarrhythmias after Cardiac Arrest in Public versus at Home, supplemental oxygen for non-hypoxic patients, return of spontaneous circulation, Bryan Bledsoe

 
Author Thumb

Bryan Bledsoe, DO, FACEP, FAAEM, EMT-PDr. Bledsoe is an emergency physician and Professor of Emergency Medicine and Director of the EMS fellowship at the University of Nevada School of Medicine in Las Vegas. He is the author of numerous EMS textbooks and articles.

BROWSE FULL BIO & ARTICLES >

What's Your Take? Comment Now ...

Buyer's Guide Featured Companies

Featured Careers & Jobs in EMS

Get JEMS in Your Inbox

 

Fire EMS Blogs


Blogger Browser

Today's Featured Posts

 

EMS Airway Clinic

Mechanical CPR is Producing Resuscitation Results Beyond Expectations

Discover why clinical studies are finding mechanical CPR just as effective as optimally-performed CPR.
More >

Multimedia Thumb

New York First Responders Take Extraordinary Steps to Help Residents

Snow causes fire and EMS crews to go beyond call of duty.
Watch It >


Multimedia Thumb

Raw Video: Explosion and Fire at California Business

Over a dozen hurt in Santa Paula blaze.
Watch It >


Multimedia Thumb

Four Workers Killed at Texas Chemical Plant

Five employees exposed to methyl mercaptan in La Porte.
Watch It >


Multimedia Thumb

Worker Killed in North Carolina Bridge Collapse

A fatal construction site collapse occurred in Wake County.
Watch It >


Multimedia Thumb

Plane Crashes into Chicago Home

Pilot reported engine trouble after takeoff.
More >


Multimedia Thumb

Switzerland Landslide Kills Two, Injures Four

Slide hits residential building near Lugano.
More >


Multimedia Thumb

World Trade Center Rescue

Technical rescue work is done at nation’s tallest skyscraper.
More >


Multimedia Thumb

The AmbuBus®, Bus Stretcher Conversion Kit - EMS Today 2013

AmbuBus®, Bus Stretcher all-hazards preparedness & response tool
Watch It >


Multimedia Thumb

Field Bridge Xpress ePCR on iPad, Android, Kindle Fire

Sneak peek of customizable run forms & more.
Watch It >


Multimedia Thumb

LMA MAD Nasal™

Needle-free intranasal drug delivery.
Watch It >


More Product Videos >