Air Medical Use of King Airway

A Pittsburg study explores non-visualized airways in EMS

 

 
 
 

Keith Wesley, MD, FACEP | | Friday, February 1, 2008


Review of: Guyette FX, Wang H, Cole JS: "King Airway Use By Air Medical Providers." Prehospital Emergency Care. 11(4):473-476, 2007.

The Science

This interesting study comes to us from the STAT Med Evac air medical service in Pittsburgh. They implemented the King LTD non-visualized airway as a rescue tool for difficult airway management. During the 10 month study they had 575 pre-hospital intubations. The flight crews, nurse and flight medic, were instructed to use a non-visualized airway after three failed intubation attempts or initially if they felt that endotracheal intubation would be difficult. They were able to administer paralytics to all patients.

Of the 575 intubations, they resorted to the King LTD in 26 patients and the Combitube in one. They confirmed tube placement and efficacy of ventilations with wave-form capnography. The majority (23/26, or 88%) were trauma victims.

Ten patients required specialized efforts by anesthesia or surgery for definitive airway management with four patients requiring emergent tracheostomy. None of the 27 patients received pre-hospital surgical airways.

They concluded that the King LTD was a satisfactory alternate airway device.

The Street

This study joins a growing number of studies exploring the role of non-visualized airways in EMS. Clearly, this small sample can t be extrapolated to other services or used to set a standard of care but it does highlight several issues relevant to pre-hospital airway management.

First, this was a highly qualified flight crew with a program that requires 12 live intubations a year to maintain proficiency. Despite this high level of training, combined with the use of RSI, they still had an ETI failure rate of 4.5%. How does your service compare?

Second, one has to wonder what the impact would be if they only allowed one ETI attempt, as does the San Diego Fire Department. Does a benefit exist in going to an alternate airway device earlier? This question is being examined by Regions Hospital EMS in Minnesota with a study of RSI followed by immediate King LTD placement.

And finally, this study underscores the point that all pre-hospital airway management should be considered difficult and approached with extreme caution armed with multiple back-up rescue plans.




Connect: Have a thought or feedback about this? Add your comment now
Related Topics: Patient Care, Airway and Respiratory

 
Author Thumb

Keith Wesley, MD, FACEP

Keith Wesley, MD, FACEP, is the Minnesota State EMS medical director and the EMS medical director for HealthEast Ambulance in St. Paul, Minn. and and can be reached at drwesley@emsconsulting.net.

BROWSE FULL BIO & ARTICLES >

What's Your Take? Comment Now ...

Featured Careers & Jobs in EMS

 

 

Get JEMS in Your Inbox

 

Fire EMS Blogs


Blogger Browser

Today's Featured Posts

 

EMS Airway Clinic

Innovation & Progress

Follow in the footsteps of these inspirational leaders of EMS.
More >

Multimedia Thumb

Tennessee County EMS Shows Off CPR Tool

Lucas 2 in service in Bradley County.
Watch It >


Multimedia Thumb

Abilene Loses Helicopter Service

Native Air leaves city with only one air helicopter service.
Watch It >


Multimedia Thumb

D.C. Fire Chief Proposes another Controversial Ambulance Plan

Staffing change will leave immediate neighborhood without fire apparatus.
Watch It >


Multimedia Thumb

FDIC 2014 CHAT: MIKE MCEVOY AND A.J. HEIGHTMAN

Mike McEvoy and A.J. Heightman discuss some new EMS technology at FDIC 2014.
Watch It >


Multimedia Thumb

LMA MAD Nasal™

Needle-free intranasal drug delivery.
Watch It >


Multimedia Thumb

Field Bridge Xpress ePCR on iPad, Android, Kindle Fire

Sneak peek of customizable run forms & more.
Watch It >


Multimedia Thumb

VividTrac offered by Vivid Medical - EMS Today 2013

VividTrac, affordable high performance video intubation device.
Watch It >


More Product Videos >