2003 JEMS 200-City Survey

EMS operational & functional trends in the country's largest cities: How does your service compare?


 
 

Keith A. Monosky, MPM, EMT-P | From the January 2008 Issue | Sunday, February 1, 2004


Every year, JEMS surveys EMS organizations in the 200 most populous U.S. cities. The 2003 200-City Survey offers greater detail in operational and functional variances among EMS agencies across the nation. This will enable managers and EMS system leaders to compare their practices to those of agencies serving the most populous cities in the United States. Additional tables and summaries of comparative analyses this year help to illustrate performance differences among the many organization types.

Every effort was made to include each organization that provides some level of EMS to each city. The response rate was 17.32%. Although a larger sampling would be desirable, this sample size is adequate to project findings and draw reasonable conclusions. This presumption is supported by consistency in data trends within this survey, as well as between the 2003 and previous years' surveys. Respondent anonymity is maintained in this report, and the information presented here is in summative form of the data collected.

Geographical coverage areas varied considerably. The average coverage area for the agencies surveyed is 289.3 square miles. Many agencies (41% of the first response agencies and 69% of the transport agencies) extend their coverage area outside the metropolitan city. The average total population served by the survey respondents is 394,403, with the highest exceeding 8 million. Forty-three percent of the respondents have primary responsibility for more than one community, with an average number of communities for which they are responsible at almost nine.

As in previous years, fire departments are the dominant agency type in the delivery of first response. More than 98% of the first responder agencies are fire departments. Other first response organizational types and their distribution are: third-party providers (9.1%), hospital-based (3.5%), public utility model (3.5%), private not-for profit (3%) and volunteer (2.2%).

AttachmentSize
2004-200CitySurvey04_tcm16-12234.pdf722.73 KB



Connect: Have a thought or feedback about this? Add your comment now
Related Topics: Administration and Leadership, Operations and Protcols, Surveys Special Topics, Jems Features

What's Your Take? Comment Now ...

Buyer's Guide Featured Companies

Featured Careers & Jobs in EMS

Get JEMS in Your Inbox

 

Fire EMS Blogs


Blogger Browser

Today's Featured Posts

 

EMS Airway Clinic

Mechanical CPR is Producing Resuscitation Results Beyond Expectations

Discover why clinical studies are finding mechanical CPR just as effective as optimally-performed CPR.
More >

Multimedia Thumb

New York First Responders Take Extraordinary Steps to Help Residents

Snow causes fire and EMS crews to go beyond call of duty.
Watch It >


Multimedia Thumb

Raw Video: Explosion and Fire at California Business

Over a dozen hurt in Santa Paula blaze.
Watch It >


Multimedia Thumb

Four Workers Killed at Texas Chemical Plant

Five employees exposed to methyl mercaptan in La Porte.
Watch It >


Multimedia Thumb

Worker Killed in North Carolina Bridge Collapse

A fatal construction site collapse occurred in Wake County.
Watch It >


Multimedia Thumb

Plane Crashes into Chicago Home

Pilot reported engine trouble after takeoff.
More >


Multimedia Thumb

Switzerland Landslide Kills Two, Injures Four

Slide hits residential building near Lugano.
More >


Multimedia Thumb

World Trade Center Rescue

Technical rescue work is done at nation’s tallest skyscraper.
More >


Multimedia Thumb

Field Bridge Xpress ePCR on iPad, Android, Kindle Fire

Sneak peek of customizable run forms & more.
Watch It >


Multimedia Thumb

Braun Ambulances' EZ Door Forward

Helps to create a safer ambulance module.
Watch It >


Multimedia Thumb

LMA MAD Nasal™

Needle-free intranasal drug delivery.
Watch It >


More Product Videos >