Exclusives
FacebookTwitterLinkedInGoogle+RSS Feed
Fire EMSEMS TodayEMS Insider

Settlement in Chicago Faulty Defibrilator Case

CHICAGO - The family of a 49-year-old man who died of a heart attack after a defibrillator on the Chicago Fire engine sent to resuscitate him did not work - because the batteries hadn't been replaced - will receive $3.2 million under a settlement advanced Monday by a City Council committee.

Frederick Partyka, a stationary engineer who worked for the city, was using a snow blower in front of his home in the 2700 block of North New England when he collapsed on Jan. 22, 2005. Partyka's son, a paramedic with the Hillside Fire Department, witnessed the incident, called 911 and administered CPR to his father while waiting for help. When the fire engine arrived at 3:16 p.m., the paramedic found Partyka in ventricular tachycardia, a life-threatening condition.

But when the paramedic attempted to shock Partyka's heart back into rhythm, the defibrillator didn't work, a lawyer for the Partyka family said. The batteries were old and did not hold a charge. When the old batteries were replaced with spare batteries, the defibrillator powered off again, the lawyer said. At 3:22 p.m., an ambulance arrived with a working defibrillator. But it was too late. Partyka was already dead.

"The industry standard required - and the manufacturer recommended - that this particular defibrillator battery had to be replaced every two years," said Susan Schwartz, an attorney representing the Partyka family. "But, on Jan. 22, 2005, no battery had been purchased by the city since October 2000. They didn't properly maintain the batteries for these defibrillators."

During Monday's Finance Committee meeting, First Deputy Corporation Counsel Karen Seimetz told aldermen that the defibrillators used on that day were replaced in March 2005. The new version uses batteries "automatically changed out with the manufacturer every two years," she said. "In the thousands and thousands and thousands of times these defibrillators have been used, this is the first known instance where this has ever occurred," she said.

Under questioning from aldermen, Seimetz acknowledged that no one knows whether a working defibrillator would have saved Partyka. But, she said, "The problem is under the law, if there's any percentage chance that a person could have survived but for the alleged negligence, that's enough to recover [damages]. Even though he had an underlying heart disease, this might have made the difference. There was no damage to the heart on autopsy."

RELATED ARTICLES

Serving the Psychological Needs of Your Employees

How does your agency help employees cope with the traumas and stressors of EMS?

A Reader Shares Her Experience with James Page

His legacy lives on. 

Vehicle Staging is Essential at an MCI

It's a time-proven practice.

Delivering a Miracle

The Oregon River Safety Program, provided by American Medical Response as a service to communities it serves in Northwest Oregon, realized a decrease in drow...

EMS Physicians Can Help Close the Gap Between EMS & Other Public Health Agencies

Return EMS to our roots of a very close and mutually productive relationship between the EMS physician and the field care providers.

Be Productive with your Meeting Time and Agenda

Meeting just to "meet" destroys productivity in organizations.

Features by Topic

JEMS Connect

CURRENT DISCUSSIONS

 
 

EMS BLOGS

Blogger Browser

Today's Featured Posts

Featured Careers