EMS WEEK
FacebookTwitterLinkedInGoogle+RSS Feed
Fire EMSEMS TodayEMS Insider

Treating Trauma

8Wk3-Wesley

Review of:Stiell IG, Nesbitt LP, Pickett W, et al: "The OPALS Major Trauma Study: Impact of advanced life-support on survival and morbidity." Canadian Medical Association Journal. 178(9):1141-1152, 2008.

The Science

The Ontario Prehospital Advanced Life Support (OPALS) Major Trauma Study was a before-and-after, system-wide controlled clinical trial conducted in 17 cities. The researchers enrolled adult patients who had experienced major trauma in a basic life-support phase and a subsequent advanced life-support phase (during which paramedics were able to perform endotracheal intubation and administer fluids and drugs intravenously). The primary outcome was survival to hospital discharge.

Among the 2,867 patients enrolled in the BLS (n = 1,373) and ALS (n = 1,494) phases, characteristics were similar. This included mean age (44.8 v. 47.5 years), frequency of blunt injury (92.0% v. 91.4%), median injury severity score (24 v. 22) and percentage of patients with Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score less than 9 (27.2% v. 22.1%). Survival didn't differ overall (81.1% among patients in the ALS phase v. 81.8% among those in the BLS phase; p = 0.65).

However, among patients with GCS score less than 9, survival was lower among those in the ALS phase (50.9% v. 60.0%; p = 0.02).

The OPALS Major Trauma Study showed that system-wide implementation of full ALS programs didn't decrease mortality or morbidity for major trauma patients. They also found that during the ALS phase, mortality was greater among patients with Glasgow Coma Scale scores less than 9. The authors concluded, "We believe that emergency medical services should carefully re-evaluate the indications for and application of prehospital advanced life-support measures for patients who have experienced major trauma."

The Street

This study will add fuel to the fire that continues to rage across the U.S. Is ALS better than BLS? Before we go on, remember that a Canadian EMT has many times the training hours of the U.S. EMT-Basic. With that being said, the OPALS study spent $15.8 million dollars in training and operational upgrades to implement ALS for trauma. During the ALS phase of this study, only 102 intubations were performed on 1,492 patients. That's $154,000 per intubation. OK, that's not fair. They also established 779 IVs, ran fluids 144 times and gave morphine 35 times. Let's just call it 1,060 ALS interventions. That's more reasonable -- $14,905 per intervention.

But it didn't make any difference!

More importantly, when they noted the subset of patients who were intubated were those with GCS less than 9 because they didn't have RSI. Not surprising, they had poorer outcomes similar to what has been documented in other studies with traumatic head injury and prehospital intubation.

Now, before you start sending me death threats: Do I think there is a role for ALS in trauma? Absolutely. But is the answer to simply train everyone and send them forth, like they did in Canada, and then hope for the best. No. We must learn from our brave northern brethren and examine our systems closely. Further, we must make risk-benefit analysis the cornerstone of any implementation. Bigger isn't always better. In many if not most systems, pre-planning and a tincture of accelerator may save more lives than the ET tube or salt water.

RELATED ARTICLES

Understanding Why EMS Systems Fail

Learn to recognize trigger points that could ruin your system.

West River Ambulance Receives New Rig

West River Ambulance in Hettinger, ND recently received a much-needed upgrade from their 1992 rig. A 2014 Ford/AEV Type III Custom Conversion rig with a 6.8 ...

Unlikely Pairing Leads to Health Care Education Wins

The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston (UTHealth) School of Nursing and Harris County Emergency Corps (HCEC) have formed an unlikely pairin...

Know When and How Your Patient Can Legally Refuse Care

Refusal of care straddles the intersection of ethical, legal and scientific domains of prehospital practice.

Reflecting on 35 Years of Innovation in JEMS

Take a walk through the last 35 years of EMS in JEMS.

Readers Sound Off About Glove Use After Patient Care

How often are you susceptible to potentially unclean surfaces?

Features by Topic

Featured Careers

 

JEMS TV

FEATURED VIDEO TOPICS

Learn about new products and innovations featured at EMS Today 2015

 

JEMS Connect

CURRENT DISCUSSIONS

 
 

EMS BLOGS

Blogger Browser

Today's Featured Posts