EXCLUSIVES
FacebookTwitterLinkedInGoogle+RSS Feed
Fire EMSEMS TodayEMS Insider

AMR Overbilling Trial Postponed Over Documents

SEATTLE, Wash. -- Superior Court Judge Jerome Leveque expressed frustration Monday that attorneys on both sides of an ambulance company overbilling lawsuit haven t reached agreement on the production of documents and patients names before a trial can occur.

The jury trial in the 2-year-old class action lawsuit against American Medical Response had been scheduled to begin this week, but it now likely won t occur until sometime next fall.

Seattle attorney Paul Dayton, representing AMR, and attorneys Roger Reed and Adam Tait, representing a group of Spokane residents who were overbilled by the ambulance company, were in court Monday seeking a new trial date and arguing over release of documents.

The judge gave Dayton and Reed until Friday to draft a list detailing areas of agreement and disagreement and outline a process for resolving those differences. If it s not done, the court will do it by order, the judge told the attorneys.

Since 1999, American Medical Response has had an exclusive contract to provide ambulance service in the city of Spokane. Because city taxpayers fund Fire Department emergency medical services, city residents can only be charged certain rates if a fire paramedic accompanies the ambulance crew to a hospital.

At the core of the litigation is how many of those patients were transported by AMR ambulances in the past eight years.

Reed told the court he won t be ready for trial until AMR is forced to disclose a complete list of city residents who were overbilled, going back to 1999. Those customers were charged the more-expensive advanced life support rate when they should have been charged the cheaper basic life support rate if a city fire paramedic was involved in the ride-in treatment.

The plaintiff s attorneys estimated there could be as many as 30,000 city residents affected by the class action suit. After all potential members of the class action are identified, each will have to be formally notified, probably through mass-mailing and public advertising. They will be given the chance to opt out of the lawsuit if they aren t interested in pursuing damages.

Another one of the remaining areas of dispute involves an estimated 20,000 city residents who were transported by AMR between January 2003 and October 2005. The ambulance company voluntarily audited those bills for that period and agreed to make $320,689 in refunds.

Some of those refunds went to insurance companies, at discounted rates, or Medicare, which paid the ambulance bills. Reed argued to the court that even if an ambulance bill was paid by Medicare or an insurance company, those residents still may be entitled to interest and treble damage awards under the state s Consumer Protection Act.

RELATED ARTICLES

Woman Loses Arm in Boston Harbor Accident

Patient’s arm was severed just below the shoulder.

Roller Coasters Crash at British Amusement Park

Four seriously injured when cars collide at one of Britain’s biggest amusement parks.

DuPont Protection Technologies Launches SafeSPEC™ Mobile

Mobile App Enables Easy-To-Read Content, Product and Technical Data From Anywhere

Scientists Work on ‘Battlefield MRI’

Los Alamos National Laboratory is designing a lower-tech, portable MRI.

California Woman Dies in Fall from Fair Ride

Patient fell 28 feet at San Bernardino County Fair.

69 Killed in Tanker Explosion in Nigeria

Runaway oil tanker exploded in a crowded bus station.

Features by Topic

Featured Careers

 

JEMS TV

FEATURED VIDEO TOPICS

Learn about new products and innovations featured at EMS Today 2015

 

JEMS Connect

CURRENT DISCUSSIONS

 
 

EMS BLOGS

Blogger Browser

Today's Featured Posts