Is More Oxygen Always Better?

Study analyzes using high-flow oxygen versus nasal cannula.

 

 
 
 

David Page, MS, NREMT-P | From the January 2011 Issue | Saturday, January 1, 2011


Please join me in giving a big thank you to Elizabeth Criss, RN, MED, MS, CEN, CCRN, for more than a decade of service to this column. Her long-term unwavering commitment to relevant research has made our profession better.

This month, as I pick up the reins, you’ll see several new features to the column. The glossary will translate research jargon into regular human language, and the “bottom line” will answer the question we all have when reading research: “How will this affect my day-to-day practice?” The “watch box” will highlight projects that are ongoing or in preliminary abstract form. Please send me your feedback and be sure to let me know if you like this approach and tell me about any research you’d like to see.

Oxygen overload
Austin, MA, Wills KE, Blizzard L, et al. Effect of high-flow oxygen on mortality in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients in prehospital setting: Randomized controlled trial. BMJ. 2010;341;c5462

It’s rare to see research initiated by EMS providers, and it’s even more rare for it to be a randomized, controlled prospective prehospital trial. This study meets the expectations of rigorous research requirements, and its Australian authors should be commended for getting it published in a prestigious medical journal clear across the globe.

When it comes to oxygen (O2), we often think “more is good.” We attach high-flow oxygen (HFO2) via mask and are surprised and maybe a little annoyed when we see the hospitals immediately switch to a nasal cannula (NC).

This trial compared outcomes of 405 patients receiving titrated O2 (n=179) via NC versus HFO2 (n=226) by non-rebreather mask (NRB). The trial included patients who were experiencing acute chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) exacerbation or shortness of breath with a history of more than 10 years of smoking.
Using computer randomization, paramedics were selected into two groups: a NC group and a HFO by NRB group. Blood gases and length of hospital stay were also compared. The primary goal was to measure their mortality.

The results showed that patients who received titrated oxygen via NC in the prehospital setting had a reduced risk of death from respiratory failure by 58% for all patients experiencing shortness of breath and 78% for COPD patients.

The HFO2 group had increased carbon dioxide (hypercapnea) and respiratory acidosis, which are associated with bad outcomes. One out of every 14 confirmed COPD patients who received NRB oxygen died. In contrast, the patients treated with NCs were significantly less likely to have respiratory acidosis or hypercapnia at
the hospital.

Limitations: Thirty-seven percent of patients in this study weren’t treated according to the protocol. Was this because paramedics in the two randomized groups sometimes worked together? Did the sickest patients, inherently more likely to die, get HFO2 despite study protocols?

We’re not sure, but one thing is clear: Although the findings of this prehospital study confirm other in-hospital studies and compel us to change, our culture of “more oxygen is always better” will be difficult
to challenge.

Bottom Line
The 2010 American Heart Association (AHA) guidelines direct us to a more careful and monitored administration of oxygen via capnography and pulse oximetry. Hospital studies show increased mortality with HFO2 use in COPD patients.

This study adds strong evidence of harm from high-flow oxygen (NNH = 14); and if your protocols allow it, strong evidence can be found for titrating oxygen therapy to maintain saturations of 88–92% in patients with COPD exacerbation.

*Disclaimer: Always discuss care delivery and protocol changes with your medical director before implementing them. Don’t be surprised if the conclusion of all research is “more research is needed” or “no single study should change our practice.” JEMS

This article originally appeared in December 2010 JEMS as “Research Review.”

Glossary
Randomized controlled trial: A precise method to randomly select patients who will receive an intervention with the goal of keeping providers from intentionally or un-intentionally skewing results by choosing patients who will or will not benefit from the experimental intervention.

Prospective trial: A research project that defines an objective to be studied, then collects data going forward in a defined time period. This is the opposite of a retrospective study, where past records are reviewed.

NNH: Number needed to harm relates to the number of patients who would need to be exposed to a particular treatment before one is harmed by that treatment. It’s used to identify the risk of an intervention. It’s similar to NNT (number needed to treat), but NNT refers to the number of patients that would be treated before one of them will likely see a benefit from the intervention.

Watch Box
Stay tuned for the full paper, but Bohanske and co-authors Harrington, White and Dyer reviewed 1,341 prehospital records comparing scene times and overall patient care times before and after the implementation of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) devices in an urban EMS system. They concluded that the use of CPAP didn’t add time. For more, see Bohanske MS, Harrington LL, White LF, et al. The effect of CPAP on patient care time in an Urban EMS system. Ann Emerg Med. 2010:56;87–88.




Connect: Have a thought or feedback about this? Add your comment now
Related Topics: Patient Care, Trauma, shock trauma, Research Review, MVCs, Liz Criss, Donald Turkey, Jems Research Review

 
Author Thumb

David Page, MS, NREMT-PDavid Page, MS, NREMT-P, is an EMS instructor at Inver Hills Community College and field paramedic with Allina EMS in the Minneapolis/St. Paul area. He’s also on the board of advisors for the UCLA Prehospital Care Research Forum. You can bike with him during the next EMS Memorial Bike Ride.

BROWSE FULL BIO & ARTICLES >

What's Your Take? Comment Now ...

Featured Careers & Jobs in EMS

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Get JEMS in Your Inbox

 

Fire EMS Blogs


Blogger Browser

Today's Featured Posts

 

EMS Airway Clinic

The Evolution of Civilian High Threat Medical Guidelines

How mass killing events have proven a need for new guidelines.
More >

Multimedia Thumb

British Medics Bid Farewell to Afghanistan Base

Medical team and troops leave Camp Bastion.
Watch It >


Multimedia Thumb

Plane Crash at Wichita Airport

Small plane crashes into airport safety building.
Watch It >


Multimedia Thumb

Authorities Investigate Firefighters at Arizona EMS Call

Confrontation caught on video involving Glendale firefighters.
Watch It >


Multimedia Thumb

Radio Problems for New York Medics

Medic’s radio failed during a call with an armed patient.
Watch It >


Multimedia Thumb

Ottawa Shooting Incident

Solider is shot by gunman at national memorial in Ottawa.
More >


Multimedia Thumb

Life Link III Trauma Tactics Conference in Minnesota

Conference was designed to enhance the skills of providers of all levels, covering rescue and prehospital situations, to transport and in-hospital treatment.
More >


Multimedia Thumb

Field Bridge Xpress ePCR on iPad, Android, Kindle Fire

Sneak peek of customizable run forms & more.
Watch It >


Multimedia Thumb

VividTrac offered by Vivid Medical - EMS Today 2013

VividTrac, affordable high performance video intubation device.
Watch It >


Multimedia Thumb

LMA MAD Nasal™

Needle-free intranasal drug delivery.
Watch It >


More Product Videos >