The Truth about IN Naxolone

 

 
 
 

Keith Wesley, MD, FACEPMarshall J. Washick, BS, NREMT-P | | Tuesday, November 24, 2009


Review of:Robertson TM, Hendley GW, Stroh G, et al: "Intranasal naloxone is a viable alternative to intravenous naloxone for prehospital narcotic overdose." Prehospital Emergency Care. 13(4):512 515, 2009.

The Science

This is a retrospective study comparing the use of two administration methods for naloxone -- intranasal (IN) versus intravenous (IV) administration for suspected acute opioid overdoses. The time span was over 17 months, which included 154 patients who were eligible for the study: 50 treated via IN and 104 treated via IV. In all, 34% of the patients treated with IN naloxone required a second dosing, and three more required subsequent dosing by IV or IM. The authors conclude that despite the time difference in clinical response, IN naloxone is a safe alternative to IV administration in acute opioid overdoses.



The Street

Intranasally administered naloxone has already been proven as clinically effective as intramuscular (IM) or IV. No one disputes that it works. But should we incorporate it into our prehospital care protocols? Dr Wesley isn't sure how it works, while Medic Marshall clearly sees the potential benefit of fewer needle sticks.

Doc Wesley:The proliferation of intranasally administered agents is rapidly changing our practice. Many of these patients are either difficult to obtain IVs on and represent a significant blood-bourne pathogen risk. I believe this study clearly showed that the IN naloxone is a reasonable alternative to IM or IV. The question the authors pose but failed to answer is whether it resulted in fewer IVs being established. Their protocol was included in the paper. It's a step-by-step process of IN, IM and then IV. The researchers stated that three patients required "rescue" IV naloxone. Did all 50 IN naloxone patients have an IV established in preparation for that potential event? If so then they didn't reduce the number of potential needle sticks.

Perhaps they did only for this study, and that's fine. But the question is, do we take this study and incorporate it into our practice in such a manner whereby when we encounter a suspected narcotic overdose (OD) we don't establish and IV, instead going directly to IN naloxone and awaiting a response. What do you do if it isn't a narcotic OD? Now it's 20 minutes later, and you still have to start an IV. I know that I'm playing the devil's advocate here, but we need to be sure to take the best information from this paper. That is that if you're confident you are dealing with a narcotic OD, then using IN naloxone alone may be an appropriate alternative.

Additionally, what are you going to do with the patient after they wake up? Most services will still transport the patient, and would they not still require an IV for safety? Perhaps not? Several years ago, the Chicago Fire Department published a study in which they administered IV naloxone and released patients from the scene. The patients didn't turn up in the morgue during the following 72 hours, leading the authors of that study to think it was safe to treat and release narcotic ODs.

Medic Marshall:Comparing the differences of a clinical procedure to improve safety and well-being of pre-hospital providers is a great research topic. Because of the general type of patient, requiring naloxone is at greater risk for blood-borne pathogens and looking at safer ways to reduce exposure is exactly what our industry needs. Abusers of opiate narcotics tend to use IV over other forms and subsequently have poor vascular access. As a result, it may prove very difficult to obtain vascular access on this population -- even for medics.

The differences between the two respectively -- 12 minutes versus eight -- doesn't really seem significant from a medic perspective. It just means assisting ventilations for a little longer. The actual time of patient contact to clinical response was still the same. Since IV drug users have a higher incident of carrying blood-borne pathogens and diseases, protecting yourself from blood exposure is of critical importance. So, I believe IN naloxone is a safe and viable alternative treatment to acute opiate ODs.

The last thing in this study that I found interesting was where the investigators noted a potential public health use for IN naloxone. Disseminating IN naloxone from methadone clinics, needle exchange clinics and other mediums (even possibly through EMS) is a very real alternative. But strong education is required for these people about the use of naloxone. They must be reminded that it is not a "safety net."

Related Resources

Meet Narcan

Research Special Topics Page




Connect: Have a thought or feedback about this? Add your comment now
Related Topics: Leadership and Professionalism, Medical Emergencies

 
What's Your Take? Comment Now ...

Featured Careers & Jobs in EMS





 

Get JEMS in Your Inbox

 

Fire EMS Blogs


Blogger Browser

Today's Featured Posts

 

EMS Airway Clinic

Simulation-Based Assessment Facilitates Learning & Enhances Clinical Judgment

Simulation is an educational tool that can be used to develop and refine clinical skills of the student in a controlled environment before they progress to becoming practicing clinicians.
More >

Multimedia Thumb

REMSA Programs Helps Reduce Hospital Visits

Community paramedic effort goes into service.
Watch It >


Multimedia Thumb

City Official Challenges San Francisco Fire Chief

Ambulance response times among problems noted by city supervisor.
Watch It >


Multimedia Thumb

Texas Ambulance Crash

Victoria ambulance collides with civilian vehicle.
Watch It >


Multimedia Thumb

Colorado Medics Ditch Pants for Kilts

“Real men do wear kilts.”
Watch It >


Multimedia Thumb

CO Leak at Illinois School

Girard incident sends over 130 to hospitals.
More >


Multimedia Thumb

Hands On September 2014

Who gets thumbs up this month?
More >


Multimedia Thumb

NYC Sept. 11 Anniversary

View images from the ceremony at Ground Zero.
More >


Multimedia Thumb

Braun Ambulances' EZ Door Forward

Helps to create a safer ambulance module.
Watch It >


Multimedia Thumb

LMA MAD Nasal™

Needle-free intranasal drug delivery.
Watch It >


Multimedia Thumb

Field Bridge Xpress ePCR on iPad, Android, Kindle Fire

Sneak peek of customizable run forms & more.
Watch It >


Multimedia Thumb

The AmbuBus®, Bus Stretcher Conversion Kit - EMS Today 2013

AmbuBus®, Bus Stretcher all-hazards preparedness & response tool
Watch It >


More Product Videos >