911 Call Didn't Mention Fire - @ JEMS.com


911 Call Didn't Mention Fire

Responders caught off guard at scene


 
 

John Futty | | Tuesday, June 17, 2008


COLUMBUS, Ohio -- A language problem did not delay firefighters in responding to a North Side apartment fire on Sunday, contrary to a story in yesterday's Metro & State section.

However, incomplete information from a 911 caller prevented first responders from knowing what awaited them at the scene.

The first of two callers to 911, who both spoke English, requested that a firefighter be sent to an apartment at 2255 Albert Ave. but didn't explain the nature of the emergency.

"What's going on? What do you need somebody over there for?" the dispatcher asked the male caller, who dialed 911 at 4:53 p.m. The caller hung up.

A paramedic unit and a fire engine were dispatched to the address to check out an unknown emergency less than a minute later, Fire Division records show.

Battalion Chief Mark Devine told a reporter at the scene that only a paramedic unit was dispatched after the first call.

Dispatchers took a second 911 call 3 1/2 minutes after the first. "There's a fire, and it's starting to spread," the male caller said.

The incident was changed to a fire emergency, and additional fire companies were dispatched at 4:58 p.m. The first paramedic and engine arrived at the scene seconds before 5 p.m. The additional fire companies arrived two minutes later.

At the scene, Devine estimated a 10-minute delay in dispatching firefighters.

Yesterday, he said his estimate was based on evidence that residents attempted to extinguish the fire themselves before 911 was dialed and the confusion surrounding the nature of the emergency.

Many of the building's residents are Somali, and fire investigators struggled to communicate with some of those they interviewed.

Although an engine was dispatched after the first call, Devine doubted that those on board were dressed in fire gear. He said the two crews "weren't enough people to deal with what they had."

The fire started in a mattress but had spread to the roof of the building by the time firefighters arrived.

None of the residents was injured, but all eight units in the building at Capital Park Apartments were damaged.


Connect: Have a thought or feedback about this? Add your comment now
Related Topics: Communications and Dispatch, Leadership and Professionalism

What's Your Take? Comment Now ...

Buyer's Guide Featured Companies

Featured Careers & Jobs in EMS

Get JEMS in Your Inbox

 

Fire EMS Blogs


Blogger Browser

Today's Featured Posts

 

EMS Airway Clinic

Improving Survival from Cardiac Arrest Using ACD-CPR + ITD

Using active compression-decompression CPR with an ITD has been shown to improve 1-year survival from cardiac arrest by 33%.
More >

Multimedia Thumb

Three Injured in Philadelphia Collapse

Parapet wall falls through roof of store.
Watch It >


Multimedia Thumb

California Firefighters save Man on Flight

Patient was conscious and talking when United flight landed.
Watch It >


Multimedia Thumb

Over Half of Seattle Fire Stations Test Positive for MRSA

Surprisingly high results come from test kits based on earlier study.
Watch It >


Multimedia Thumb

Hands On February 2015

Here’s a look at this month’s product hands on.
More >


Multimedia Thumb

Nightwatch Series Premiere Party

JEMS Editor-in-Chief A.J. Heightman attends the series premiere of A&E's new reality show, "Nightwatch."
More >


Multimedia Thumb

Ottawa Chemical Investigation

Chemicals and suspicious package are probed at two locations
More >


Multimedia Thumb

Braun Ambulances' EZ Door Forward

Helps to create a safer ambulance module.
Watch It >


Multimedia Thumb

Field Bridge Xpress ePCR on iPad, Android, Kindle Fire

Sneak peek of customizable run forms & more.
Watch It >


Multimedia Thumb

VividTrac offered by Vivid Medical - EMS Today 2013

VividTrac, affordable high performance video intubation device.
Watch It >


Multimedia Thumb

LMA MAD Nasal™

Needle-free intranasal drug delivery.
Watch It >


More Product Videos >