Are Vital Signs Vital?

Study determines whether vital signs successfully predict outcomes in trauma patients

 

 
 
 

Keith Wesley, MD, FACEPMarshall J. Washick, BS, NREMT-P | | Sunday, August 30, 2009


Review of:Chen L, Reisner AT, Gribok A: "Exploration of prehospital vital sign trends for the prediction of trauma outcomes." Prehospital Emergency Care. 13(3):286 294, 2009.

The Science

The authors of this study attempted to look at trends and averages in vital signs of trauma patients in the prehospital setting. The investigators obtained data from 2001 2004 from EMS flight teams transporting patients to the Level 1Unit of Memorial Hermann Hospital in Houston. Vital signs were measured using the Propaq 206EL transport monitor, and other attribute data was retrospectively collected through EMS charts.

The focus was on trauma patients who required a blood transfusion within 24 hours of admission to the hospital. A total of 897 patients in a three-year span qualified for the study, however, only 97 (11%) patients fit the initial inclusion criteria. The authors then made the inclusion criteria less stringent and ran various statistical analyses to look for trends in vital signs.

The methods and results sections are extremely technical and full of statistical jargon, but the authors are clearer in the discussion section of the paper. They conclude vital signs in the trauma patient are too variable in the prehospital setting to give any sort of prediction on the outcome of the patient.

The Street

Namely, the authors concluded that vital signs aren't a good predictor of how patients are actually compensating for shock.

Doc Wesley:I'm not sure what to make of this study. It's more a study in statistics than a true clinical study. To avoid boring you to death, I'll simply say the researchers only eliminated the majority of their subjects because they didn't have "valid" vital signs. They were only comparing the vital signs obtained during the first 10 minutes of flight with the second 10 minutes of flight, since the majority of flights lasted only 20 minutes. Additionally, they arrived at the scene 40 minutes after the injury and didn't use the ground crews' vital signs.

Finally, their primary outcome for major trauma (hemorrhage patients) was those who received a blood transfusion. This is not a standard definition in trauma research and could affect their results. So overall, while I agree with their conclusion, I don't believe they proved it with this research.

Medic Marshall:So what does that mean for us street folks? Well, vital signs are still important and we shouldn't stop doing them as a result of this paper. What it does say is trauma patients have bad vital signs (who knew?) and implies that some trauma patients may be more injured than their vital signs indicate.

For example, if a patient who was the un-seat belted driver of a sport utility vehicle that rolled over at high-speed is walking around on scene, they may be far more injured than the vitals (B/P: 146/90, RR: 20, HR: 100, SaO2: 98%) tell.

Mechanism of injury suggests the patient ought to be transported to a Level I Trauma Center, though the vitals are fairly close to normal range. Furthermore, those vital signs shouldn't keep us from providing other care, such as putting the patient in full spinal immobilization precautions, starting two large-bore IVs (maybe even blood tubing), and putting them on a cardiac monitor.

In the end, patient care is complex, and we sometimes need to be reminded that the whole (patient care) is greater than the sum of its parts (i.e., vital signs, mechanism of injury and medical history.)




Connect: Have a thought or feedback about this? Add your comment now
Related Topics: Cardiac and Circulation, Extrication and Rescue, Head and Spinal Injuries, Medical Emergencies, Patient Management, Research

 
What's Your Take? Comment Now ...

Buyer's Guide Featured Companies

Featured Careers & Jobs in EMS

Get JEMS in Your Inbox

 

Fire EMS Blogs


Blogger Browser

Today's Featured Posts

 

EMS Airway Clinic

Mechanical CPR is Producing Resuscitation Results Beyond Expectations

Discover why clinical studies are finding mechanical CPR just as effective as optimally-performed CPR.
More >

Multimedia Thumb

New York First Responders Take Extraordinary Steps to Help Residents

Snow causes fire and EMS crews to go beyond call of duty.
Watch It >


Multimedia Thumb

Raw Video: Explosion and Fire at California Business

Over a dozen hurt in Santa Paula blaze.
Watch It >


Multimedia Thumb

Four Workers Killed at Texas Chemical Plant

Five employees exposed to methyl mercaptan in La Porte.
Watch It >


Multimedia Thumb

Worker Killed in North Carolina Bridge Collapse

A fatal construction site collapse occurred in Wake County.
Watch It >


Multimedia Thumb

Plane Crashes into Chicago Home

Pilot reported engine trouble after takeoff.
More >


Multimedia Thumb

Switzerland Landslide Kills Two, Injures Four

Slide hits residential building near Lugano.
More >


Multimedia Thumb

World Trade Center Rescue

Technical rescue work is done at nation’s tallest skyscraper.
More >


Multimedia Thumb

Field Bridge Xpress ePCR on iPad, Android, Kindle Fire

Sneak peek of customizable run forms & more.
Watch It >


Multimedia Thumb

VividTrac offered by Vivid Medical - EMS Today 2013

VividTrac, affordable high performance video intubation device.
Watch It >


Multimedia Thumb

The AmbuBus®, Bus Stretcher Conversion Kit - EMS Today 2013

AmbuBus®, Bus Stretcher all-hazards preparedness & response tool
Watch It >


Multimedia Thumb

LMA MAD Nasal™

Needle-free intranasal drug delivery.
Watch It >


More Product Videos >