EMS Panel Releases National Field Triage Guidelines


 
 

Bob Bailey, MA | Richard C. Hunt, MD, FACEP | Scott Sasser, MD, FACEP | | Tuesday, February 1, 2011


Injuries are the leading cause of death for children and adults in the U.S. between the ages of 1 and 44. So when an injury does occur, getting the right patient to the right place at the right time really matters. The National Study on the Costs and Outcomes of Trauma reported a 25% reduction in death for severely injured patients who received care at a Level I trauma center rather than at a non-trauma center.(1) When do we have an opportunity in EMS—or in all of medicine for that matter—to reduce the number of deaths by 25%?

In 2006, the Institute of Medicine published The Future of Emergency Care in the United States. One of the volumes of this report, “Emergency Medical Services at the Crossroads,” describes the fragmentation of EMS. The report recommends working toward regionalization and the development of prehospital care protocols for the treatment, triage and transport of patients using the best evidence available.(2)

Therefore, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), in collaboration with the American College of Surgeons Committee on Trauma and with the support of the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), convened the National Expert Panel on Field Triage to reduce fragmentation by examining the latest evidence and making recommendations regarding the field triage of injured patients. The results of this panel’s effort were published as the “Guidelines for Field Triage of Injured Patients: Recommendations from the National Expert Panel on Field Triage,” in CDC’s Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report: Recommendations and Reports.

A Good Idea?
This was a first for EMS. The only other federally supported EMS clinical protocol we’re aware of is the recent H1N1 protocols for EMS.(3) Although this achievement was significant, it isn’t enough to just develop recommendations; the recommendations must also demonstrate achievement of improved health outcomes for patients. Guidelines must be developed, disseminated, implemented and evaluated. The important challenge is to translate evidence into practice for real-life situations that occur daily.

Some may prefer that federal agencies not be involved in the development of EMS clinical protocols. Issues of local preferences and practice patterns, state regulations versus guidelines, differing opinions among medical professionals and the role of the federal government in EMS come into play.

Knowing this, some may question why we should try to get all EMS providers to make the right transport decisions every time. Others may emphasize that the guidelines are far from perfect. So why use or adopt them?

These guidelines are designed to serve as a tool that EMS providers, along with the rest of the trauma system, can use to identify patients who are severely injured. Adopting the guidelines is in the best interest of our patients and will likely save lives.

Conclusion
Adopting national guidelines developed through federal leadership may be a new frontier, but implementing them could significantly decrease EMS system fragmentation. They’ll also provide a platform for us to gather uniform data on the triage of injured patients, which will lead to improving the evidence base, facilitating regionalization and allowing for use of the best evidence (albeit limited) available.

We all have a responsibility to get an injured patient to the right place at the right time. In addition to trauma, many other EMS protocols need to be developed, disseminated, implemented and evaluated. It’s important to not just watch but to also be a part of these pioneering efforts of trying to put a national EMS clinical guideline into practice.

We, the acute care community, needs to figure this out. The process we undertake with the guidelines is a crystal ball into the future of our nation’s EMS system. And with a potential 25% decrease in deaths, it’s in your patients’ best interest. JEMS

References

1. MacKenzie EJ, Rivara FP, Jurkovich GJ, et al. A national evaluation of the effect of trauma-center care on mortality. N Engl J Med. 2006;354:366–378.

2. Institute of Medicine. Committee on the Future of Emergency Care in the United States in the United States Health System. Board on Health Care Services. Emergency Medical Services at the Crossroads. The National Academies Press: Washington, D.C., 2006.

3. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Interim Guidance for EMS Systems and 9-1-1 PSAPS for Management of Patients with Confirmed or Suspected Swine-Origin Influenza A (H1N1) Infection. www.cdc.gov/h1n1flu/guidance_ems.htm

This article originally appeared in February 2011 JEMS as “Triage to Transport: A case for national field triage guidelines.”




Connect: Have a thought or feedback about this? Add your comment now
Related Topics: Administration and Leadership, Leadership and Professionalism, transport, NHSTA, Level 1 trauma center, field triage, CDC

Bob Bailey, MA, is a contractor with McKing Consulting and senior consultant to the director of the National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, Division of Injury Response, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. He is the past director of the North Carolina Office of Emergency Medical Services and currently serves on the North Carolina State EMS Advisory Board. He can be reached at bbaily@nc.rr.com.

BROWSE FULL BIO & ARTICLES >

Richard C. Hunt, MD, FACEPRichard C. Hunt, MD, FACEP, is the director of the CDC National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, Division of Injury Response.

BROWSE FULL BIO & ARTICLES >

Scott Sasser, MD, FACEP, is an associate professor in the Department of Emergency Medicine at Emory University’s School of Medicine and at the Hubert Department of Global Health, Rollins School of Public Health. He’s also the associate director for International Programs for the Center for Injury Control at Emory and directs the department of emergency medicine’s International Health Fellowship. He works through an interagency personnel agreement in the Division of Injury Response at CDC’s National Center for Injury Prevention and Control (Injury Center) on issues specific to acute trauma care, emergency medicine and EMS.

BROWSE FULL BIO & ARTICLES >

What's Your Take? Comment Now ...

Featured Careers & Jobs in EMS





 

Get JEMS in Your Inbox

 

Fire EMS Blogs


Blogger Browser

Today's Featured Posts

 

EMS Airway Clinic

Innovation & Progress

Follow in the footsteps of these inspirational leaders of EMS.
More >

Multimedia Thumb

New Item on Iowa Helicopter Helps Save Patient’s Life

Supply of blood recently added to LifeFlight helicopter.
Watch It >


Multimedia Thumb

Shooting Inside Pennsylvania Hospital

Early reports of one person dead in Darby hospital.
Watch It >


Multimedia Thumb

Anchorage Chief Proposes Shifting Fire, Medic Crews

Officials debate ways to reduce paramedic burnout.
Watch It >


Multimedia Thumb

Kansas City Woman Thanks EMTs Who Saved Her Life

CPR save highlights community awareness program
Watch It >


Multimedia Thumb

LMA MAD Nasal™

Needle-free intranasal drug delivery.
Watch It >


Multimedia Thumb

VividTrac offered by Vivid Medical - EMS Today 2013

VividTrac, affordable high performance video intubation device.
Watch It >


Multimedia Thumb

Braun Ambulances' EZ Door Forward

Helps to create a safer ambulance module.
Watch It >


More Product Videos >