NFPA Draft 1917 Could Mean New Rigs - Administration and Leadership - @

NFPA Draft 1917 Could Mean New Rigs


Gary Ludwig, MS, EMT-P | From the April 2011 Issue | Friday, April 1, 2011

I recently saw a press release about a new ambulance the U.S. Army purchased for the treatment and transport of wounded soldiers from the battlefield. The mine resistant, ambush protected, heavy armored ground ambulance (HAGA) is like nothing I’ve ever seen.

The HAGAs, which will be deployed to Iraq and Afghanistan, are designed to protect the crew and patient from improvised explosive devices and rocket grenade attacks. They have a specialized interior compartment design that allows four ambulatory patients or two stretcher patients to be transported side by side. They also have on-board oxygen, military-grade medical equipment and power for other medical equipment.

A similar attempt—although dramatically different in design—is being made in the civilian sector to protect crews from “rockets” in the form of cars and trucks that hit ambulances head-on, at intersections and on our nation’s highways. Since the 1970s, the federal government specifications (KKK-A-1822) have been widely used by many ambulance services and state governments when designing, building and licensing ambulances. These federal specifications were intended to standardize purchasing. They weren’t developed with a primary focus on safety.

For the past several years, a committee of EMS professionals, ambulance manufacturers and others have been working on ambulance specifications that may become the industry standard. The organization heading the change is the National Fire Protection Association (NFPA), and the committee is developing the NFPA 1917 standard for auto­motive ambulances.

New Standard
Initially, some critics said the NFPA was heading the writing and designing of specifications so the fire service could take control of the process. Not true. The NFPA has a long track record and a proven method for developing standards for manufacturing fire and EMS-related equipment and procedures that are widely used by many outside the fire service. Many of those standards take safety into consideration.

In the case of the ambulance specifications committee, the intent wasn’t to write specifications for just fire department ambulances, but for all ambulances, regardless of the operator. To accomplish this process, committee members were selected from diverse backgrounds within the EMS profession, including private services, third-service agencies and fire departments.

It’s also important to note that any ambu­lance specifications the NFPA 1917 committee develops will be consensus standards. Nothing will mandate the use of these standards unless the federal or a state government decides to adopt them and turn them into law. It’s important to point out, however, that in lawsuits, the courts consider consensus standards when determining fault.

In late 2010, the NFPA released the 83-page draft document that contained the ambu­lance specifications. As part of the process, the NFPA had an open comment period during which anyone could provide comments. This process closed Dec. 15, and the comments are being reviewed before the document is finalized and released in 2013.

The new document has some changes to ambulance specifications that, if adopted, will increase the cost of ambulances in the future. The changes primarily come in the form of required equipment, testing and documentation that we didn’t have in the past.

One potential change would be the requirement for a “black box,” or data recorder that traces such things as speed, the use of sirens, headlights or emergency lighting, where pro­viders were seated and whether they had their seatbelt on. Black boxes have been used for years in airplanes and were recently incorporated into some of the other NFPA standards for fire apparatus.

One standard in the document puzzled me, and to date, I haven’t been able to get a clear explanation. The standard would limit the top speed of an ambulance to 72 mph. Why 72 and not 75 or 71? We need some empirical evidence or a study that shows why ambulance speeds should be limited to 72 mph.

Increased Safety
One intention of the 1917 standard is to enhance the safety of those who ride in ambulances, whether they’re a patient, a caregiver, the driver or a passenger.

A National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health analysis of data from 1991–2002 showed there were 300 fatal ambulance crashes during that time period. Of those 300 fatal crashes, 275 of those killed were pedestrians and occupants of other vehicles, and 82 deaths occurred in ambulances. Twenty-seven of these deaths involved EMS providers, of which 41% were drivers, 19% were in the right front seat and 26% were in the rear patient compartment.

It will be interesting to see what the final standard looks like. Will the committee lean more toward safety, or will it slant more toward savings on vehicle costs?

My preference is safety. JEMS

This article originally appeared in April 2011 JEMS as “NFPA Draft 1917: EMS rigs may change.”

Connect: Have a thought or feedback about this? Add your comment now
Related Topics: Administration and Leadership, Leadership and Professionalism, Gary Ludwig, Jems Leadership Sector

Author Thumb

Gary Ludwig, MS, EMT-P

Gary Ludwig, MS, EMT-P, is a well-known author, lecturer and consultant who has successfully managed two large award-winning metropolitan fire-based EMS systems. He has 37 years of fire, rescue and EMS experience and has been a paramedic for over 35 years. He’s also past chair of the EMS section for the International Association of Fire Chiefs and has a master’s degree in management and business. He can be reached at


What's Your Take? Comment Now ...

Buyer's Guide Featured Companies

Featured Careers & Jobs in EMS

Get JEMS in Your Inbox


Fire EMS Blogs

Blogger Browser

Today's Featured Posts


EMS Airway Clinic

Innovation & Advancement

This is the seventh year of the EMS 10 Innovators in EMS program, jointly sponsored by Physio-Control and JEMS.
More >

Multimedia Thumb

Salt Lake City Firefighters Injured in Firehouse Fire

Nine sent to a hospital with smoke inhalation.
Watch It >

Multimedia Thumb

Pennsylvania Paramedic Killed in the Line of Duty

West End Ambulance medic killed at accident scene.
Watch It >

Multimedia Thumb

Wesleyan Students Hospitalized for Overdose

11 students transported to local hospitals.
Watch It >

Multimedia Thumb

Rigs Going in Service from EMS Today 2015

Snap shots of some of the vehicles at EMS Today that will be on the streets soon
More >

Multimedia Thumb

Florida Hospital Fire

Fire halts construction project at Tampa cancer center.
More >

Multimedia Thumb

Braun Ambulances' EZ Door Forward

Helps to create a safer ambulance module.
Watch It >

Multimedia Thumb

VividTrac offered by Vivid Medical - EMS Today 2013

VividTrac, affordable high performance video intubation device.
Watch It >

Multimedia Thumb

The AmbuBus®, Bus Stretcher Conversion Kit - EMS Today 2013

AmbuBus®, Bus Stretcher all-hazards preparedness & response tool
Watch It >

More Product Videos >